Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Tmt.V.Sivagami vs 4 Tmt.S.Geetha Shanmugam

Madras High Court|20 February, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Main Writ Petition is one challenging an order of transfer.
2. Writ petitioner is a Noon Meal Scheme employee.
3. It is stated by Mr.V.Sivalaiyam, learned counsel for M/s C.S.Associates that the writ petitioner has now resigned her job and therefore, the matter has become infructuous.
4. Mr.Gunasekaran, learned Additional Government Pleader is present on behalf of the respondent 1.
5. The submission made by the counsel for writ petitioner is recorded and the writ petition is dismissed of as infructuous. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
NAMAKKAL CONSTITUENCY THIRU NAGAR NAMAKKAL.
4 TMT.S.GEETHA SHANMUGAM COUNSILLOR WARD 26 THILLAIPURAM NAMAKKAL.
M.SUNDAR.J rg W.P.No.806 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 20.02.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Tmt.V.Sivagami vs 4 Tmt.S.Geetha Shanmugam

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
20 February, 2017