Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Tmt.Vijayalakshmi vs The State Of Tamil Nadu

Madras High Court|22 December, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.]
1. The petitioner is the wife of the detenu, namely, Arul, alias, Arulprakash, S/o.Arumugam, male, aged about 40 years. The detenu stands detained by the second respondent by virtue of his order bearing C.M.P.No.61/Goonda/C2/2017 dated 26.10.2017, wherein, he has been held to be a "Goonda", within the meaning of Section 2(f) of the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982. 1.1. The said order is under challenge in this Habeas Corpus Petition.
2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the said order of detention, passed by the second respondent against the husband of the petitioner has been revoked by the Government in G.O.Rt.No.5903, Home, Prohibition & Excise (XIV) Department dated 12.12.2017; a copy of the order has also been produced.
3. The submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, is taken on record. Accordingly, the petition is closed, as the same has been rendered infructuous.
Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St.George, Chennai  600 009.
2.The District Magistrate and District Collector, Salem District, Salem.
3.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Salem.
4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Madras.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.
And N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
pri H.C.P.No.2088 of 2017 22.12.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Tmt.Vijayalakshmi vs The State Of Tamil Nadu

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
22 December, 2017