Petitioner has approached the second respondent, Tahsildar for measuring and demarcating the property based on Ext.P1 decree. According to the petitioner, the State bought the share of his brother, Vijayakumar. The final decree in the partition suit between plaintiff/State and Vijayakumar and petitioner is passed on 31.08.1999. Ext.P1 clearly indicates the allotment of land in favour of the petitioner and also reference to Ext.P1(a) plan.
2. In view of the above, Tahsildar shall take necessary action in the light of final decree passed to demarcate the property of the petitioner. It is made clear that if Ext.P1 decree has become final; that shall be only the guiding factor for determining the boundaries of the property. Needful shall be done within a period of two months after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and to any parties to whom any property has been alloted under Ext.P1.
The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
Sbna/17/10/14 A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE.