Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Tirloki Nath Gautam And Others vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|12 September, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 25355 of 2018 Petitioner :- Tirloki Nath Gautam And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shashi Kumar Dwivedi,Vidya Kant Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Raj Kumar Tripathi
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.
Heard Sri Vidya Kant Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Raj Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the caveator and Sri A.K. Sand, learned AGA for the State and perused the impugned F.I.R. as well as material brought on record.
The relief sought in this petition is for quashing of the F.I.R. dated 21.08.2018 registered as Case Crime No. 94 of 2018, under sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 IPC, PS Pawara, district Jaunpur.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. The allegations levelled against the petitioners are absolutely false, frivolous and baseless. From a perusal of the FIR, no offence is made out against the petitioners, hence, the same be quashed.
Sri Raj Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the caveator and Sri A.K. Sand, learned A.G.A. have opposed the prayer for quashing of the F.I.R. which discloses cognizable offence.
The Full Bench of this Court in Ajit Singh @ Muraha v. State of U.P. (2006 (56) ACC 433) reiterated the view taken by the earlier Full Bench in Satya Pal v. State of U.P. (2000 Cr.L.J. 569) after considering the various decisions including State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (AIR 1992 SC 604) that there can be no interference with the investigation or order staying arrest unless cognizable offence is not ex-facie discernible from the allegations contained in the F.I.R. or there is any statutory restriction operating on the power of the Police to investigate a case.
From the perusal of the FIR, prima facie it cannot be said that no cognizable offence is made out. Hence, no ground exists for quashing of the F.I.R. or staying the arrest of the petitioners.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh-I, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.) Order Date :- 12.9.2018 Sazia
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Tirloki Nath Gautam And Others vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
12 September, 2018
Judges
  • Ramesh Sinha
Advocates
  • Shashi Kumar Dwivedi Vidya Kant Tripathi