Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Tinku vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|20 December, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 49
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 44007 of 2018 Applicant :- Tinku Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Om Narayan Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and the learned A.G.A.
This petition is filed by the petitioner for quashing the charge sheet No. 712A of 2018 dated 26.2.2018 submitted in case crime no. 881 of 2015 under section 307 I.P.C. P.S. Deoband district Saharanpur pending in the court of A.C.J.M. Deoband in criminal case No. 924 of 2018 (State Versus Tinku).
After arguing at some length, learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would be sufficiently met in case bail application of petitioner is considered expeditiously in accordance with law.
In view thereof, it is provided that if the petitioner surrenders before the Court below within three weeks from today and applies for bail, the Court below will consider the same, in accordance with law in view of the observations made in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in [2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC)].
For a period of three weeks, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner.
With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 20.12.2018 N.A.
(Vivek Chaudhary,J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Tinku vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
20 December, 2018
Judges
  • Vivek Chaudhary
Advocates
  • Om Narayan Dwivedi