Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2016
  6. /
  7. January

Tilak Raj Khanna And Another vs State Of U.P. Thru' The Chief ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|05 August, 2016

JUDGMENT / ORDER

1. Called in revised. None appeared to press this revision. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. This criminal revision under Section 401 read with Section 397 Cr.P.C. has been filed aggrieved by order dated 28.01.2005 passed by Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Kanpur in Complaint Case No. 1679 of 2005 summoning the revisionists under Section 85(a) and (e) of E.S.I. Act, 1948.
3. Having gone through the impugned order, I do not find any manifest error or otherwise illegality so as to warrant interference.
4. Dismissed.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Certify this judgment to the lower Court immediately.
Order Date :- 5.8.2016 PS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Tilak Raj Khanna And Another vs State Of U.P. Thru' The Chief ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
05 August, 2016
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.