Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Thummalapenta Saraswathi vs State Bank Of India And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|22 March, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF MARCH, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NOS.32182 & 32184/2013 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
1. SMT. THUMMALAPENTA SARASWATHI AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, W/O SRI. THUMMALAPENTA SATISH BABU, R/AT FLAT NO.001, HOSYALA SRIRANGA APARTMENTS, 45/1, 11TH CROSS, LAKSHMAIAH BLOCK, GANGANAGAR, PETITIONER IN BANGALORE – 560024 W.P.No.32182/2013 2. MRS. SMITHA AIYAPPA K. AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, W/O SRI. PEMMAIAH B. D. R/AT "MYTHRI" 4C-408, 4TH MAIN, 4TH CROSS, KASTURINAGAR EAST, RAMAMURTHYNAGAR, BANGALORE - 560016 (BY SRI. O. SHIVARAMA BHAT, ADV.) AND 1. STATE BANK OF INDIA ... PETITIONER IN W.P.No.32184/2013 REP. BY ITS ASST. GENERAL MANAGER AND AUTHORIZED OFFICER, CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT BRANCH, ACR TOWERS, 3RD FLOOR, NO.32, RESIDENCY ROAD, BANGALORE - 560025 2. DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA, STRESSED ASSETS MANAGEMENT, NO.61, 4TH FLOOR, "RESIDENCY PLAZA, RESIDENCY ROAD, BANGALORE - 560025 3. M/S. ROYAL ENCLAVE REGD. OFFICE AT NO.985/1, "SKANDA" 14TH CROSS, MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT, BANGALORE - 560086 AND ALSO AT NO. 717, 2ND FLOOR, POORNASHASHI COMPLEX, MODI HOSPITAL ROAD, 2ND STAGE, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, BASAVESHWARANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560086 REP. BY IS PARTNERS SRI V. BHASKAR REDDY AND RIPUNJAYA REDDY 4. M/S. PRESDIENCY GRAND NO.717, 2ND FLOOR, POORNASHASHI COMPLEX, 2ND STAGE, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, BASAVESHWARANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560086 REP. BY ITS PARTNER 5. RESERVE BANK OF INDIA 10/3/8, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560001 REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER 6. J. M. FINANCIAL ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD. HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT 7TH FLOOR, CNERGY APPASAHEB MARATHI MARG PRABHADEVI MUMBAI – 400025 BY ITS SENIOR ANALYST MS. FARAH KARACHIWALA AGED 27 YEARS W/O. ROHIT PERIERA (BY SRI. A. RAVISHANKAR, ADV. FOR R1 & 6 R5 – SERVED & UNREPRESENTED NOTICE TO R2 TO R4 HELD SUFFICIENT DATED 03.06.2016) ... RESPONDENTS THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE DEMAND NOTICE DT.5.7.11, & ALSO THE NOTICE DT.7.5.113, ISSUED BY THE R1 & R2 RESPECTIVELY VIDE ANN- A TO E RESPECTIVELY IN SO FAR AS SITE OF THE PETITIONERS BEARING SITE NOS.176, 202, 164 & 180 OR CONSEQUENTLY DECLARE THAT THE NOTICES SENT TO THE PETITIONERS VIDE ANN-B TO E ARE NOT BINDING ON THE PETITIONERS.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties. Therefore, he files a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petitions.
2. Memo is taken on record. Writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE VP
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Thummalapenta Saraswathi vs State Bank Of India And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
22 March, 2019
Judges
  • Alok Aradhe