A.M.Shaffique, J Petitioner has approached this Court seeking for police protection. 2. An interim order was passed by this Court on 28.9.2012, which reads as follows :
"We heard the learned senior counsel for the petitioner and also the learned counsel appearing for the party respondents. Learned counsel for the party respondents would point out that due to the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner is putting off the settlement in the matter. We make it clear that not only must the petitioner participate in the conciliation proceedings, but he will not set up the pendency of the writ petition as a reason for not arriving at a settlement.”
3. Learned State Attorney on instructions submits that after making necessary enquiries with the petitioner, the petitioner had informed the police that no further protection is necessary.
Having regard to the said submission, the writ petition has become infructuous and the same is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
ASHOK BHUSHAN, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/-
A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE.
sou.