Petitioner challenges the action of the Secretary of the 2nd respondent Municipality, who, it is alleged, is interfering with the enjoyment of the property by the petitioner. It is submitted that there is a suit pending in which an injunction has also been granted against the 2nd respondent Municipality. Bringing these facts to the notice of the Municipality, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P6 representation before the 1st respondent. The limited prayer of the petitioner at this stage is for a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P6 representation. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the 1st respondent.
3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P6 representation W.P.(C).No.12043/2014 2 within a period of two months from today after hearing the petitioner.
Subject to the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of.
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE prp