Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Thirunindra Narayana Finances & vs The Commissioner Of Police

Madras High Court|28 June, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The Writ Petitioner, who is a finance company, filed this Writ Petition with a prayer forbearing the respondents 1 to 3 or their subordinates from enquiring into the civil liability between the petitioner and the respondents 4 to 5 forming the subject matter of the Suit is O.S.No.1282 of 2003 pending on the file of the VII Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.
2. At the outset, the prayer sought for in the Writ Petition cannot be entertained under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in view of the fact that the Inspector of Police and the police authorities are duty bound to conduct enquiry. If any complaint is filed against any person, the authority of conducting an enquiry either by the Commissioner of Police or by his subordinates cannot be taken away by way of issuing a writ by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
3. Admittedly, the suit in O.S.No.1282/2003 is pending and the civil disputes in between the parties can be resolved by way of civil suit that will not prevent any one of the parties from filing the complaint before the police authorities with regard to the commission of any offence by either of the parties.
4. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to consider the very relief sought for in this writ petition and the same is not maintainable and cannot be entertained. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as not maintainable, however, there shall be no order as to Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Thirunindra Narayana Finances & vs The Commissioner Of Police

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
28 June, 2017