IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JULY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION No.28905 OF 2019 AND WRIT PETITION NOS.29628-29629 OF 2019 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
1. SMT. THIMMAKKA W/O SRI RAMACHANDRAIAH AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS 2. SRI R KRISHNAPPA S/O SRI RAMACHANDRAIAH AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS 3. SRI R RANGASWAMY S/O SRI RAMACHANDRAIAH AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF SY.NO.166/2, WARD NO.18 BEHIND RAJ COMPLEX HULIYAR ROAD CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI TOWN TUMKUR DISTRICT – 572240.
(BY SRI.S.P.KULKARNI, ADV.,) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY DEPT. OF REVENUE VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU – 560 001.
... PETITIONERS 2. THE TAHSILDAR CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI TALUK DISTRICT TUMKUR PIN CODE:572 214.
3. THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI POLICE STATION CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT PIN CODE:572 214.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.PRATHIMA HONNAPURA, AGA) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 HEREIN TO CLEAR THE DISTURBANCE FOUND ON THE ROAD/PASSAGE TO REACH SY.NO.166/2A BEHIND THE RAJ COMPLEX AT WARD NO.18, CHIKANAYAKANAHALLI AND ETC.
THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Sri.S.P.Kulkarni, learned counsel for the petitioners.
Smt.Prathima Honnapura, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents.
The petition is admitted for hearing. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the same is heard finally.
2. In these petitions, the petitioners inter alia seeks for a direction to the respondent No.2 to consider the representation submitted by the petitioners vide Annexure-‘F’.
3. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the writ petitions may be disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to consider the representation vide Annexure-‘F’ submitted by the petitioners in accordance with law.
4. On the other hand, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondents submitted that the representation submitted by the petitioners shall be dealt with in accordance with law, if not already decided.
5. In view of the submissions made and in the facts of the case, the writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to consider and decide the representation submitted by the petitioners, if not already decided, in accordance with law by a speaking order within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case.
Accordingly, the writ petitions are disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE VMB