IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19th DAY OF JULY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE Dr. JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY R.F.A.No.823 OF 2013 BETWEEN:
1. Smt. Thimmakka, Daughter of Late Moogappa, Wife of Chenna Reddy, Aged about 79 years.
2. Smt. Amaravathi, Daughter of Late Chenna Reddy, Aged about 32 years.
3. Smt. Manjula, Daughter of Late Chenna Reddy, Aged about 35 years.
4. Smt. Nirmala alias Vimala, Daughter of Late Chenna Reddy, Aged about 42 years.
Appellants No.1 to 4 are Presently residing in the Portion of survey No.123/1, Kodihalli Village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk, Bangalore-560 087.
(By Sri.N.J.Ramesh, Advocate) …Appellants AND:
1. Sri. Nagaraja, Son of Late Muddappa, Aged about 53 years.
2. Smt. Gunamma, Wife of Nagaraja, Aged about 47 years, Respondents No.1 & 2 Are residing at Chalagatta Village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, Yamlur Post, Bangalore-560 037.
(By Sri.V.B.Shivakumar, Advocate) **** …Respondents This Regular First Appeal is filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated:31.01.2013 passed in O.S.No.1190/2008 on the file of the XVII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore, decreeing the suit for permanent injunction.
This Regular First Appeal coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following:
O R D E R Called again in the second round. None appear in the matter.
Learned counsel for the appellants absent. Inspite of granting sufficient opportunities, the appellants have not filed paperbook.
The appeal is of the year 2013 and sufficient opportunity even as ‘finally’ and ‘as a last chance’ was given to the appellants to file paperbook and to proceed further in the matter.
Since the appellants are not evincing any interest in the matter, it is to be taken that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the matter. As such, the appeal stands dismissed for non- filing of paperbook and for non-prosecution of appeal.
Sd/- JUDGE PN