Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Thaseena Banu And Others vs Srinivasa Prasad K N And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|13 July, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JULY, 2019 CONCILIATORS PRESENT:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA & SRI. M.N. UMASHANKAR, MEMBER M.F.A.No.1598/2018 (MV) (Lok Adalat No.2387/2019) BETWEEN 1. Thaseena Banu, W/o Late Anjan Pasha @ Amjad Pasha, Aged about 26 years, 2. Abdul Salam, S/o Late Abdula Khader, Aged about 63 years, 3. Khairunnisa, W/o Abdul Salem, Aged about 62 years, All are R/at Jamal Sabaraplay Kasaba Hobli, Magadi Taluk, Ramanagar Dist. - 561 101. ... Appellants (By Sri. Shripad V. Shastri, Advocate) AND 1. Srinivasa Prasad K.N, S/o Naryan, R/at Kudur Village & Post, Magadi Taluk, Ramanagar District - 561 101.
(RC Owner of LGV bearing Reg. No.KA-37-2640) 2. ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd., No.89, SVR Complex, Hosur Main Road, Madivala, Bengaluru - 68.
(Insurance cover note No.A/112813475 valid from 06.12.2012 to 05.06.2013) …Respondents (By Sri. H.N. Keshava Prashanth, Advocate for R.2) MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 04.11.2017 PASSED IN MVC NO.50/2014 (OLD NO.234/2013) ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MAGADI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.
CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants - claimants and the learned Counsel appearing for the second Respondent - ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited along with its representative are present.
2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellants (being authorized by the appellants to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the second respondent - Insurance company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellants - claimants have agreed to receive and the second respondent - Insurance company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.2,87,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Eighty-seven Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim.
3. The second Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit.
4. The apportionment, deposit and release of the enhanced compensation amount shall be made as per the ratio adopted by the Claims Tribunal 5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly.
Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER LL
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Thaseena Banu And Others vs Srinivasa Prasad K N And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
13 July, 2019
Judges
  • B Veerappa
  • Sri M N Umashankar