Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Thangaraj And Others vs Balambal

Madras High Court|31 January, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

M.V.MURALIDARAN.J.,
vs It is reported by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that the matter was already settled between the parties. Therefore, nothing survives in the Civil Revision Petition. Hence, the prayer in the civil revision petition has become infructuous.
2.Recording the said submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as one having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
31.01.2017 vs Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No To The Sub-Court, Dharapuram.
C.R.P(NPD)No.312 of 2011 and
M.P.No.1 of 2011
http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Thangaraj And Others vs Balambal

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
31 January, 2017
Judges
  • M V Muralidaran