IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NOs.18492 OF 2014 & 54485-54505 OF 2014 (GM-PP) BETWEEN:
1. SMT. THAMARAI W/O MURGAN AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS.
2. S. SELVI W/O PARASHURAM AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS.
3. M. ESWARI W/O VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS.
4. NAGARATHNAMMA W/O BASAVARAJU AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS.
5. MANOHAR W/O CHANNAVEERAIAH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS.
6. NETHRAVATHI W/O PALAKSHA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS.
7. SARASWATHI W/O JAYARAMREDDY AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.
8. VASANTHA W/O MURTHHI AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS.
9. B.N. RAJAPPA S/O. SANNANANJE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS.
10. GEETHA W/O MURUGESH AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS.
11. PUSHPA W/O SWAMY KANNAN AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS.
12. LAKSHMAMMA W/O RAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS.
13. MANJU LATHA SAHOO W/O DILIP KUMAR PAL AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS.
14. JAYAMMA W/O OBALAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS.
15. SUBRAMANYAN S/O ARMUGAM AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS.
16. JOHN .M S/O MARIYADAS AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.
17. CHANDRA MANI SAHOO S/O BHAGEERATH AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS.
18. N. BALAKRISHNA S/O NARASIMHAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS.
19. M. LALITHA W/O SOMANNA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS.
20. PUDUPUTTAN S/O ARMUGAM AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS.
21. MAMATHA W/O MADESHA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS.
22. MANJUNATHA S/O MADHANASWAMY .D AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS.
ALL ARE RESIDING AT RAMASAGARA VILLAGE ATTIBELE HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE DISTRICT.
(BY MR. RAKSHIT K.N. ADV.) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE.
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT BANGALORE.
3. THE TASHILDAR OFFICE OF THE TASHILDAR ANEKAL TALUK, ANEKAL.
4. THE ZILLA PANCHAYAT REP. BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER K.G. ROAD, BANGALORE.
5. THE CHANDAPURA MUNICIPALITY REPRESENTED BY ITS CHANDAPURA MUNICIPALITY OFFICER CHANDAPURA, ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT.
… PETITIONERS … RESPONDENTS (BY MR. VIJAY KUMAR A. PATIL, AGA FOR R1 TO R3 MR. M.S. PRAKASH & MS. M.S. BHARATHI, ADVS., FOR R4 & R5) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO EXPEDITE AND ALLOT THE RESIDENTIAL SITES UNDER 'ASHRAYA YOJANA' TO THE VICTIMS WITHIN THE TIME STIPULATED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT & ETC.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Mr.Rakshit K.N., learned counsel for the petitioners.
Mr.Vijay Kumar A.Patil, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
Mr.M.S.Prakash & Smt.M.S.Bharathi, learned counsel for respondent Nos.4 and 5.
2. The writ petitions are admitted for hearing.
With consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the same is heard finally.
3. In these petitions, the petitioner inter alia seeks a direction to the respondents to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner.
4. When the matters were taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the representation submitted by him shall be considered. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the same shall be dealt with in accordance with law if not already decided.
5. In view of the submissions made and in the facts of the case, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petitions with a direction to the competent authority to decide the representation submitted by the petitioner, if not already decided in accordance with law by a speaking order within four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits.
Accordingly, the petitions are disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE SS