Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

M/S Textool Company Ltd vs The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

Madras High Court|06 February, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06.02.2017 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HULUVADI G. RAMESH & THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH Tax Case No.1176 of 2008 M/s.Textool Company Ltd., (Presently M/s.Lakshmi Machine Works Ltd) Perianaickenpalayam, Coimbatore 641 020 ... Petitioner Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Company Circle IV(2) Race Course Road, Coimbatore ... Respondent Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 20A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” Bench, Chennai dated 8th February 2008 in ITA No.2754/Mds/2005.
For Appellant : Mr. R.Venkata Narayanan for M/s.Subbaraya Aiyar For Respondents : Mr. T.R.Senthilkumar
ORDER
(Delivered by Dr.Anita Sumanth, J.) The admitted substantial question of law raised in the present appeal filed by the assessee is as follows:
“1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the appellant is not entitled to set off of brought forward depreciation loss as on 01.04.1997againstg the capital gains for the assessment year 2001-02?
2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in ignoring the clarification issued by the Finance Minister in his speech while presenting the Finance Bill, 1996 and the ratio of the decision of apex Court in the case of Kerala State Industries Corporation Ltd v. CIT, 259 ITR 51?
2. Mr. R.Venkata Narayanan, appearing for the assessee and Mr.Senthilkumar appearing for the department would bring to our notice that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (in short 'Tribunal') has, in deciding the issue, set out above against the assessee, merely followed the decision of the Special Bench of the Tribunal in the case of M/s.Southern Travels Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (103 ITD 198). They would also bring to our notice that the order of the Special Bench was the subject matter of appeal in TC(A).No.758 of 2007 and a Division Bench of this Court, vide order dated 20.1.2015 has remanded the issues back to the file of the Tribunal for consideration afresh. The Division Bench has been of the view that the core issue raised has not been addressed or answered by the Special Bench of the Tribunal.
3. In the light of the aforesaid order, the present appeal is remanded to the file of the Tribunal to be heard along with the appeal that was the subject matter of T.C.A.No.758 of 2007 in the case of M/s.Southern Travels Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax. The questions of law are thus returned unanswered and the appeal of the assessee is allowed by way of remand. No costs.
msr Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No To The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Company Circle IV(2) Race Course Road, Coimbatore .
[H.G.R.,J.] & [A.S.M.,J] 06.02.2017 HULUVADI G. RAMESH, J.
& Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, J.
msr Tax Case No.1176 of 2008
06.02.2017
http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M/S Textool Company Ltd vs The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
06 February, 2017
Judges
  • Huluvadi G Ramesh
  • Anita Sumanth