IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF AUGUST 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NOs.33582-33584 OF 2019 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
1. SHRI.TESHEE VENKATESH, AGED 52 YEARS, SON OF RAMAIAH, RESIDING AT NO.25, PRAVEEN MANSION, 5TH MAIN, GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 009.
2. SRI.NARASIMHA RAJU, AGED 62 YEARS, SON OF NARASAPPA, RESIDING AT NO.69, 2ND MAIN ROAD, CHIKKALASANDRA, BENGALURU - 560 061.
3. SRI.M.NARAYAN MURTHY, AGED 58 YEARS, SON OF LATE S.MUNIYAPPA, RESIDING AT NO.4, 1ST STREET, ULSOOR, BENGALURU - 560 008.
(BY SRI.G.R.MOHAN, ADVOCATE) … PETITIONERS AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES, NO.01, ALI ASKAR ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001.
2. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF DISTRICT REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES-ZONE 4, BENGALURU DISTRICT, NO.146, SAHAKARA SOUDHA, 3RD FLOOR, 3RD MAIN, 8TH CROSS, MARGOSA ROAD, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU - 560 003.
3. KARNATAKA FILM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, CRESCENT ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001, BY ITS PRESIDENT.
4. SHRI.S.R.GOVINDU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, SON OF LATE RAMEGOWDA, RESIDING AT NO.67, 7TH CROSS, ‘BYRAVA NILAYA’, MARUTHI LAYOUT, BASAVESHWARANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 059.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B.BALAKRISHNA, AGA FOR R1 AND R2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT TO THE R-1 AND 2 TO CONSIDER THE COMPLAINT OF THE PETITIONERS DTD:10.07.2019 AS PER ANNEXURE-C AND ETC., THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Sri. G.R. Mohan, learned counsel for the petitioners.
Sri. B. Balakrishna, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Taking into account the order which this Court proposes to pass, it is not necessary to issue notice to remaining respondents.
The petitions are admitted for hearing. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the same are heard finally.
2. In these petitions, the petitioners inter alia seek for a direction to respondent Nos.1 and 2 to consider the complaint submitted by the petitioners dated 10.07.2019 vide Annexure-C.
3. When the matters were taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the writ petitions may be disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos.1 and 2 to consider the complaint dated 10.07.2019 submitted by the petitioners in accordance with law.
4. On the other hand, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2 submitted that the representation submitted by the petitioners shall be dealt with in accordance with law, if not already decided.
5. In view of the submissions made and in the facts of the case, the writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to consider and decide the complaint submitted by the petitioners, if not already decided, in accordance with law by a speaking order within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today after affording an opportunity of hearing to all necessary parties.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case.
Accordingly, the writ petitions are disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE Mds/-