Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Tejpal Singh vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|07 April, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 86
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 16188 of 2021 Applicant :- Tejpal Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Rajat Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Chand,J.
Heard learned counsel for applicant(s), learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
This bail application has been preferred by the accused- applicant(s), Tejpal Singh, who is involved in Case Crime No. 1117 of 2019, under Sections 170, 171, 420, 468, 471 I.P.C.
P.S.- Highway, District- Mathura.
Learned counsel for the applicant(s) in support of his prayer for bail submits that the applicant(s) is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that as per the F.I.R allegations the police party apprehended the applicant with these allegations that the applicant is imposing himself to be police personnel to dupe the persons to provide job and from the possession of the applicant uniform of police, one country made pistol, two live cartridge and I.D card were recovered. There is no independent witness of the alleged recovery. Criminal history of the applicant has been explained in para 12 to 14 of the affidavit filed in support of this bail application. The applicant has been languishing in jail since 01.012.2019.
On behalf of State bail has been opposed.
Admittedly, there is no evidence against the applicant in regard to duping any specific person by imposing himself as police personnel.
In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by learned counsel for both sides and going through the record, without commenting on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case for bail.
Let applicant(s), Tejpal Singh, be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:
(i) The applicant(s) shall not indulge in any criminal activity.
(ii) The applicant(s) shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.
(iii) The applicant(s) shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.
(iv) The applicant(s) shall regularly appear on the dates fixed by the trial court unless his personal attendance is exempted by the trial court.
In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, liberty is given to the trial court to cancel the bail of the applicant(s) without any reference to this Court.
Order Date :- 7.4.2021 PS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Tejpal Singh vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
07 April, 2021
Judges
  • Subhash Chand
Advocates
  • Rajat Kumar Shukla