HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.36177 of 2014 Date:27.11.2014 Between:
Tejomoi Mahila DWACRA Group, reptd by its President-Gurugumalli Lakshim, W/o Kanaka Raju and two others.
. Petitioners And:
The Commissoner, Industrial Area Local Authority (IALA), Vijayawada and two others.
. Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Bujji Babu Davuluri Counsel for the Respondents: Sri P.Roy Reddy The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside tender notice No.01/IALA/Ja.AA/V/2014-15, dated 19.11.2014, of respondent No.1, whereunder he has invited tenders for undertaking sanitation work in Autonagar of Vijayawada.
I have heard Sri Bujji Babu Davuluri, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri P.Roy Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for APIIC.
The petitioners, who claimed to be undertaking sanitation work for a number of years in Autonagar, Vijayawada, filed Writ Petition No.29532 of 2014 questioning the proposed action of the respondents in calling for tenders for sanitation work in Autonagar, Vijayawada. This Court, while taking note of the fact that the period of agreement for which the petitioners have been entrusted with the sanitation work has come to an end on 30.09.2014, disposed of the said Writ Petition, by order, dated 01.10.2014, with liberty to the petitioners to make representation to the respondent-authorities for appropriate relief within two weeks and further directed the respondent-authorities to consider the continuance of the petitioners’ services and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within four weeks thereafter.
In my opinion, the petitioners cannot be permitted to file successive Writ Petitions for the same relief. When the respondents have attempted to call for tenders, the petitioners have filed Writ Petition No.29532 of 2014. If the respondents have not considered the petitioners’ case, as directed by this Court, the appropriate remedy for them is to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondents. I am, therefore, of the opinion that the petitioners have availed a wrong remedy.
The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to avail the remedy of contempt proceedings.
As a sequel, WPMP.No.45296 of 2014 is dismissed as infructuous.
27th November 2014 DR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY