Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Tejbali Patel vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|04 June, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23437 of 2019 Applicant :- Tejbali Patel Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Rudra Kant Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ram Krishna Gautam,J.
By means of this application the applicant Tejbali Patel has prayed to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 54 of 2019, u/s 8/20 N.D.P.S. Act, P.S. Karma, District Sonebhadra.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA representing the State. Perused the record.
Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number with a planted recovery of 1.2 Kg. of Ganja, which is just above small quantity and is much less commercial quantity. There was no such recovery nor compliance of section 50 of N.D.P.S. Act was there nor there was any independent public witness of alleged recovery nor the accused applicant is of any criminal antecedent. There is no likelihood of applicant's fleeing from course of justice or tempering with evidence, in case he is released on bail. Hence bail has been prayed for.
Learned AGA has vehemently opposed the bail application..
Having heard learned counsel for both the parties, gone through the material placed on record, nature of accusation, severity of punishment in case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie case, without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, this bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant, Tejbali Patel, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence.
2. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity.
3. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial.
4. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned.
In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail.
Order Date :- 4.6.2019 Pcl
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Tejbali Patel vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
04 June, 2019
Judges
  • Ram Krishna Gautam
Advocates
  • Rudra Kant Mishra