Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Tej Pratap Yadav vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 April, 2019

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Dr. Udai Veer Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has filed the supplementary counter affidavit in compliance of order of this Court, today in the Court, the same is taken on record.
During the course of arguments, Dr. Udai Veer Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has produced the copy of judgment of this Court rendered in the case of Hari Pal Singh vs. State of U.P. & others reported in [2016 (7) ADJ 655 (LB] submitting that the issue in question is squarely covered with the aforesaid case of Hari Pal Singh (supra), therefore, this case may be decided in terms of the aforesaid judgment of this Court in re: Hari Pal Singh (supra).
Sri Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he could not go through the aforesaid judgment of Hari Pal Singh (supra), therefore, he may be granted atleast 24 hours time so that he may go through the aforesaid judgment to address the Court.
List/ put up tomorrow i.e. 01.05.2019 in the additional cause list to be taken up at 3:00 p.m. Interim order, if any, to continue till the next date of listing.
Order Date :- 30.4.2019 Suresh/ [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Tej Pratap Yadav vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 April, 2019
Judges
  • Rajesh Singh Chauhan