IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.9286 OF 2019 (GM-RES) BETWEEN M/S. TECHNO TRADE #183, 3RD FLOOR SAMPIGE ROAD MALLESHWARAM BENGALURU-560003 REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR (BY SRI. VEENA J KAMATH, ADV.) AND ... PETITIONER THE COMMISSIONER THE DIRECTORATE OF EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING KAUSHALYA BHAWAN DAIRY CIRCLE BANNERGHATTA ROAD BENGALURU-560 029.
... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. Y. D. HARSHA, AGA) ******* THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE PETITIONER’S REPRESENTATION DATED 20.12.2018; 16.10.2018;
4.9.2018; 2.8.2018; 12.7.2018 AND 14.6.2018 AS PER ANNEXURE-F AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO RELEASE THE PETITIONER'S DUES.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Smt.Veena J.Kamath, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Sri.Y.D.Harsha, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent.
2. The writ petition is admitted for hearing.
With consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the same is heard finally.
3. In this petition, the petitioner is seeking for a writ of mandamus to consider the petitioner’s representations dated 20.12.2018, 16.10.2018, 04.09.2018, 02.08.2018, 12.07.2018 and 14.06.2018.
4. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition be disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the competent authority. On the other hand, learned Additional Government Advocate submitted that if such a representation is made by the petitioner the same shall be dealt with in accordance with law.
5. In view of the submissions made and in the facts of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a liberty that if the petitioner makes a fresh representation to the competent authority within two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today, the competent authority is directed to decide the representation afresh submitted by the petitioner within a period of four months from the date of receipt of such a representation by a speaking order and in accordance with law.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE VMB