The petitioner is aggrieved against the Tender-cum-Auction Notice insofar it relates to auctioning of the license for collecting the rent in the Daily Vegetable Market in column No.5.
2.Mr.H.Mohammed Imran, learned counsel takes notice for the respondent.
3.The only grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent has issued the impugned Tender notification without fixing the actual amount to be collected from the respective shops and therefore, that would lead to confusion and also in allowing the successful bidder to collect arbitrary amount from the persons running the shops.
4.The learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that the apprehension of the petitioner is not well founded, as the general terms and conditions annexed to the tender process clearly indicate the actual amount to be collected from each shops and when such general condition is also stated in the notification as binding on the present tender process, the petitioner need not have any apprehension. He has also produced the copy of the general terms and conditions, wherein it is specifically referred to the quantum of amount to be collected from the respective shops. Therefore, I find that the apprehension of the petitioner is not having any substance and therefore, based on such apprehension, the petitioner is not entitled to file such writ petition.
5.Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed by recording the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed.
To The Municipal Commissioner Devakottai Municipality, Devakottai, Sivagangai District..