Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Tasleem vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 October, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33140 of 2021 Applicant :- Tasleem Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sudhir Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the informant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
By means of this application, the applicant who is involved in Case Crime No. 210 of 2021, under Sections 363, 376(2) N I.P.C. and section 6 POCSO Act, P.S. Bithari Chainpur, district-Bareilly, is seeking enlargement on bail during the trial.
The first information report was lodged by the informant against the present accused about the enticement of his daughter.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that as per medical opinion the alleged victim was aged about eighteen years. She in her statement recorded under Sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. (Annexure- 3 & 6) has categorically stated that she had left her parental home on her own sweet and gone with the applicant, developed sexual relations with him and she is pregnant. Further submission is that the alleged victim has solemnized marriage with the applicant on her own accord, copy of Nikahnama is annexed as Annexure-9 to the affidavit accompanying the bail application. He lastly submits that the applicant, who is in jail since 29.5.2021 and has no criminal antecedents to his credit is entitled to be enlarged on bail during pendency of the trial.
The prayer for bail has been vehemently opposed by learned A.G.A.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of the punishment, submissions of learned counsel for the parties, considering that the victim is major and she has solemnized marriage with the accused, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail during the pendency of the trial.
Let the applicant, Tasleem be released on bail in the aforesaid case on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:-
(a) The applicant shall attend the court according to the conditions of the bond executed by him.
(b) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad, self attested by learned counsel for the applicant along with a self attested identity proof of the said persons (preferably Aadhar Card) mentioning the mobile number (s) to which the said Aadhar Card is linked before the concerned Court/Authority/Official.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 27.10.2021 Faridul
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Tasleem vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 October, 2021
Judges
  • Ajit Singh
Advocates
  • Sudhir Kumar Tiwari