Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 19697 of 2018 Petitioner :- Tasheer Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudhir Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Arun Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; Shri Bipin Bihari Pandey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Shri Arun Kumar Srivastava, Advocate appearing for the Gaon Sabha.
Notice need not be issued to the private respondents in view of the order proposed to be passed.
Petitioner before this Court is assailing the validity of order dated 30.03.2015 passed by Tehsildar (Judicial) Bilari, Tehsil Bilari, District Moradabad. Further prayer At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel as well as Shri Arun Kumar Srivastava, Advocate raised a preliminary objection that the present writ petition has been filed with the delay and laches and the same is liable to be dismissed on this ground alone.
On such an objection, this Court has proceeded to consider the report submitted by the Stamp Reporter wherein it has been mentioned that the present writ petition has been filed with the delay of 2 years 331 days. This Court has also perused the record in question and the same does not contain any plausible reason for the delay and laches, in view of this, the writ petition cannot be entertained by this Court and the same is dismissed on the ground of delay and laches. However dismissal of the present writ petition would not come in the way of petitioner to agitate his claim before the appropriate forum.
Order Date :- 29.5.2018 A. Pandey