Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Taseem vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|20 December, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 57418 of 2019 Applicant :- Taseem Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Shravana Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Mr Jitendra Kumar, learned AGA and perused the record of the case.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that 160 tabs of Clonazepam is alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the applicant, of which the commercial quantity is 100 grams. The applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that there is no public witness to the said recovery and also there is no compliance of Section 50 and 42 of the NDPS Act. He submits that the applicant is in jail since 22.6.2019.
Learned AGA could not dispute the aforesaid facts advanced by learned counsel for the applicant.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the view that the applicant has made out a fit case for bail. Hence, the bail application is hereby allowed.
Let the applicant Taseem be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned in case crime No. 219 of 2019, under Sections 8/22 of the NDPS Act, P.S. Nakud, District Saharanpur, subject to following conditions:-
i) The applicant will not tamper with prosecution evidence and will not harm or harass the victim/complainant in any manner whatsoever.
ii) The applicant will abide the orders of court, will attend the court on every date and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever.
(iii) The applicant will not indulge in any unlawful activities.
(iv) The applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner whatsoever.
It is clarified that anything said in this order is limited to the purpose of determination of this bail application and will in no way be construed as an expression on the merits of the case. It is further clarified that the trial court shall be absolutely free to arrive at its independent conclusions on the basis of evidence led unaffected by anything said in this order.
Order Date :- 20.12.2019 RavindraKSingh
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Taseem vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
20 December, 2019
Judges
  • Vivek Varma
Advocates
  • Shravana Kumar Yadav