Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Taqseer Fatma vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|05 January, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 37
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 24837 of 2020 Petitioner :- Taqseer Fatma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sharad Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rajiv Joshi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing counsel.
The present under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed challenging the impugned show caused notice dated 28.10.2020, issued by District Magistrate, Fatehpur, to the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is working as Gram Pradhan.
Learned Standing counsel submits that respondent No. 2- District Magistrate, Fatehpur, has power to issue show cause notice. It is further submitted that the petitioner has a remedy to submit his reply for the same.
For the reasons mentioned above, I do not find any good ground to interfere under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioner to take such recourse, which is available under the law.
Order Date :- 5.1.2021 S.K.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Taqseer Fatma vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
05 January, 2021
Judges
  • Rajiv Joshi
Advocates
  • Sharad Kumar Srivastava