Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2011
  6. /
  7. January

Tanzeem Ahmad vs The State Of U.P Thru Secy., Home ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 October, 2011

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.
It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that in the present case the cognizance has been taken by the learned A.C.J.M., Court No. 27, Lucknow whereas the alleged occurrence has not taken place in the territorial jurisdiction of Luchnow even then without doing the proper investigation the charge sheet has been submitted and learned Magistrate has taken the cognizance, therefore, the cognizance taken by the learned Magistrate concerned may be quashed.
In reply of the above contention, it is submitted by learned A.G.A. that such issue may be taken by the applicant before the court concerned.
Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. it is directed that in case the applicant raise this issue before the court concerned within 30 days from today through his counsel, the same shall be heard and disposed of by the court concerned under the provisions of law.
With this direction, this application is finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 21.10.2011 RPD
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Tanzeem Ahmad vs The State Of U.P Thru Secy., Home ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 October, 2011
Judges
  • Ravindra Singh