Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Tamil Nadu State Transport ... vs A.Chandru(Minor)

Madras High Court|16 March, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Challenging the quantum of compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal, in M.C.O.P.No.4127 of 2005, on 07.02.2014, the Transport Corporation has come forward with this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.
2. The claimant A.Chandru who was aged 12 years,a seventh standard student, met with an accident that occurred on 02.01.2005. Due to which, he sustained crush injury in the left leg, avulsion injury from below knee to dorsum of left leg and fracture of left ankle. Hence, he filed a claim petition in M.C.O.P.No.4127 of 2005, seeking compensation for a sum of Rs.7,00,000/-.
3. The Tribunal, on consideration of oral and documentary evidence has awarded a sum of Rs.2,18,000/-, with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of petition till the date of deposit. The break-up details of the same are as follows:
Loss of income - Rs.30,000/-
Transport to Hospital - Rs.10,000/-
Extra nourishment - Rs.10,000/-
Damage to clothing - Rs. 1,000/-
4. The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the compensation awarded towards disability, Pain and suffering, Transportation is on the higher side. He would further submit that the Claims Tribunal has not accepted the evidence of the driver.
5. A perusal of the award passed by the Claims Tribunal would go to show that P.W.2-doctor- who examined the claimant assessed disability @ 40%. He has also issued Ex.P9. The tribunal considering the same has fixed the disability @ 30% and by taking Rs.2,000/- per percentage a sum of Rs.80,000/- was awarded towards permanent disability, which is not excessive.
6. Considering the age of the claimant, nature of injury and the period of treatment undergone by the claimant, a sum of Rs.35,000/- is awarded under the head Pain and Sufferings, a sum of Rs,10,000/- towards extra nourishment, a sum of Rs.15,000/-towards loss of amenities, a sum of Rs.10,000/- towards transport charges, which is not excessive. The tribunal based on the evidence of P.W.1 and Ex.P1 has rightly fixed the negligence on the part of the driver of the appellant Corporation. Hence, there is no reason to interfere with the Judgment and decree of the Claims Tribunal dated 07.02.2014.
7. In the result, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed, confirming the Judgment and decree of the Claims Tribunal, in M.C.O.P.No.07.02.2014. The Transport Corporation is directed to deposit the entire compensation within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On such deposit being made, the claimant is permitted to withdraw. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
16.03.2017 arr Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No To The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, III Small Causes Court, Chennai.
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J arr CMA.No.237 of 2015 16.03.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Tamil Nadu State Transport ... vs A.Chandru(Minor)

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
16 March, 2017