Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Tamil Nadu Express Transport Division – 3 Chennai vs Sekar And Others

Madras High Court|04 January, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE S.VIMALA
C.M.A.No.SR 102763 of 2003 and C.M.P.No. 20848 of 2003 Tamil Nadu Express Transport Division – 3 Chennai. ... Appellant versus
1. Sekar
2. Tamil Nadu Transport Division – 2, Villupuram. ... Respondent
Prayer: The Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Decree made dated 16.12.2002 made in M.C.O.P. No. 786 of 1997 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Judge (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal), Cuddalore.
For Appellant : Mr. K.J. Sivakumar For Respondent : No appearance
JUDGMENT
The Transport Corporation has filed this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, challenging the Judgment and decree dated 16.12.2002 made in M.C.O.P. No. 786 of 1997 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Judge (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal), Cuddalore, which is pending in SR stage from the year 2003 onwards, i.e. exactly from 10.10.2003.
2. Despite pendency of appeal in SR stage for 13 years, no steps have been taken to get it numbered.
3. Since this appeal is pending for 13 years at the SR stage, it is taken up for disposal at the SR stage itself.
4. In respect of the injuries due to the accident, that had taken place on 12.04.1997, the injured made a claim of Rs.1,50,000/-. As against the claim made, the Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.95,730/- as compensation.
5. The compensation awarded by the Tribunal is only a sum of Rs.95,730/-, which may appear to be excessive for the year 2002, but not as of now, that is in the year 2017. The compensation awarded is hardly adequate in the face of spiraling inflation and surge in cost of living. Inflation is naturally compounding, and a relentless destroyer of the value of money. The same is supported by the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Rathi Menon v. Union of India 2001 (2) KLT 12: (2001 AIR SCW 1074), wherein it has been held that when injuries occurred due to accidental falling of a person, considering the value of money etc., compensation shall be payable on the basis of rules prevailing at the time of making the final order for payment of compensation and not on the money value which prevailed on the date of accident.
6. In view of the same, the amount awarded by the Tribunal cannot be said to be excessive. Therefore, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is SR stage is rejected, confirming the award passed by the Tribunal. No costs. C.M.P.No.20848 of 2003 is closed.
04.01.2017 TK/ogy To 1. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Additional Subordinate Judge) Cuddalore.
Dr.S.VIMALA, J.
ogy/rts C.M.A.No.SR 102763 of 2003 and C.M.P.No. 20848 of 2003 04.01.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Tamil Nadu Express Transport Division – 3 Chennai vs Sekar And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
04 January, 2017
Judges
  • S Vimala