Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Tabassum Fatima And Another vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 15023 of 2019 Petitioner :- Tabassum Fatima And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bal Ram Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Heard Sri Bal Ram Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent.
The petitioner had taken a loan from Adhar Housing Finance Limited, which is a private institution and does not come within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India, hence, the writ petition is not maintainable.
However, it is open to the petitioners to take recourse the remedy available to them under the law.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 30.4.2019 Ajeet
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Tabassum Fatima And Another vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 April, 2019
Judges
  • Bharati Sapru
Advocates
  • Bal Ram Gupta