IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE:
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION No.54906/2017 (GM – CPC) BETWEEN:
SMT T S VIJAYALAKSHMI AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, WIFE OF SRI T V SRINIVASA MURTHY RESIDING AT NO.2 9TH MAIN ROAD, BSK 2ND STAGE-560 070 REPRESENTED BY HER GPA HOLDER SRI T V SRINVIAS MURTHY [BY SRI V B SHIVAKUMAR, ADV.] AND:
1. SMT YASHODAMMA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, WIFE OF LATE A SHAMAPPA REDDY KUDLU VILLAGE SARJAPURA HOBLI SINGASANDRA POST BENGALURU-560 068 2. SRI SUNIL GAVASKAR AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, SON OF LATE A SHAMAPPA REDDY SARJAPURA HOBLI SINGASANDRA POST, BENGALURU-560 068 3. SMT A SATHYAMMA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, WIFE OF LATE A SHAMAPPA REDDY KUDLU VILLAGE ... PETITIONER SARJAPURA HOBLI SINGASANDRA POST BENGALURU-560 068 4. SRI S GANESHA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, SON OF LATE A SHAMAPPA REDDY KUDLU VILLAGE SARJAPURA HOBLI SINGASANDRA POST, BENGALURU-560 068 5. SMT SUNITHA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF LATE SHAMAPPA REDDY KAMMASANDRA VILLAGE ELECTRONIC CITY POST ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU-560 029 6. SRI NATARAJ AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,SON OF LATE B N SHIVALINGAPPA NO.96 5TH CROSS K R LAYOUT J P NAGAR BENGALURU-560 078 7. SRI D V SURESH AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, SON OF SRI N VENKATASWAMY REDDY DOMMASANDRA SRAJPAURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU-560 068 8. SRI S K RAJAN MAJOR BY AGE SON OF LATE S R KRISHNAN NO.98/6 BETWEEN 4TH AND 5TH MAIN, 13TH CROSS MALLESHWARAM BENGALURU-560 003 …RESPONDENTS [R-1, R-2, R-4, R-7 & R-8 ARE SERVED- UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD 30.10.2017 IN O.S.NO.307/2006, PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT ANEKAL VIDE ANNX-A AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R This writ petition is filed against the order dated 30.10.2017 on the application filed under Order 1 Rule 10 read with Order 22 Rule 10(2) of CPC in O.S.No.307/2006 on the file of the Prl. Civil Judge and JMFC at Anekal ['Trial Court' for short].
2. It is discerned that the said O.S.No.307/2006 has been disposed of by the Trial Court and hence, writ petition does not survive for consideration.
In view of the aforesaid, writ petition stands dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE PMR