Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

T Revathy vs The Commissioner And Others

Madras High Court|04 August, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by R. SUBBIAH, J.,)
Mr.R.Arunmozhi, learned standing counsel takes notice for the respondents 1 & 2. Mr.P.Sanjay Gandhi, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice for for the 3rd respondent.
2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents 1 & 2 from initiating any coercive action of locking and sealing and demolition action with regard to the building put up atNew No.2, Old No.37, Rajavelu Street, Perambur, Chennai-11, pending determination of the revision petition filed by the petitioner dated 09.06.2017 before 3rd respondent, under Section 80-A of the Town and Country Planning Act.
3. It stated by the petitioner that he is the owner of the subject property. He claims that the building in the subject property was constructed after obtaining necessary planning permission from the Corporation of Chennai. However, alleging violation in the building plan, the Corporation authorities issued Notice dated 26.05.2017 to lock and seal the premises. Assailing the same, the petitioner preferred a special revision along with a stay petition, under Section 80A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act on 09.06.2017 before the 3rd respondent and the same is pending consideration. Apprehending that the respondents would initiate coercive action, the present writ petition is filed by the petitioner.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, We direct the 3rd respondent to consider the revision and the stay petition filed by the petitioner on 09.06.2017 and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till the disposal of the appeal, no coercive steps shall be taken by the respondent authorities.
The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No ssv Copy to
1. The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Building, Chennai-600 008.
2. The Executive Engineer, Corporation of Chennai, Zone-VI, No.5, Anderson Road, (R.P.S.J.,) (A.D.J.C.J.,) 04-08-2017 Ayanavaram, Chennai-23.
3. The Government of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-9.
R.SUBBIAH, J., AND A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA,J.,
W.P.No.20853 of 2017
and W.M.P.No.21714 of 2017
04-08-2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

T Revathy vs The Commissioner And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
04 August, 2017
Judges
  • R Subbiah
  • A D Jagadish Chandira