Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

T Ramakrishnappa vs Sri Dhobi Ramaiah

High Court Of Karnataka|31 May, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF MAY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT WRIT PETITION NO.50802 OF 2014 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
T RAMAKRISHNAPPA, S/O LATE THIMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/AT YALAVAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABHA HOBLI, MULBAGAL TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563101. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI K VISHWANATHA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI V S HEGDE, ADVOCATE) AND:
SRI DHOBI RAMAIAH, S/O NANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/AT YALAVAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABHA HOBLI MULBAGAL TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563101. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI MOHAN KUMAR T, ADVOCATE) **** THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO 2 SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 16.09.2014 PASSED BY THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AT MULBAGAL, ON IA.NO.11 FILED UNDER ORDER 23 RULE 1 OF CPC., IN OS.NO.16/2009, AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND CONSEQUENTIALLY ALLOW THE ABOVE SAID APPLICATION.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Heard.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo submitting that the suit filed by the petitioner before the trial court has itself been disposed off and the writ petition has thus become infructuous.
3. Considering the submission of the counsel for the petitioner, memo is accepted.
4. The writ petition is disposed off as withdrawn, in terms of memo.
Sd/- JUDGE SJ
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

T Ramakrishnappa vs Sri Dhobi Ramaiah

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
31 May, 2019
Judges
  • Krishna S Dixit