IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD R.S.A. No.980 OF 2017 Between:
T.R.Raghavendra Aged about 68 years S/o Ramakrishna Rao R/at Yadagudde Village Thirthahalli Post Thirthahalli Taluk Shivamogga-577 432 ... Appellant (By Sri. Mahesh S.T., Advocate - Absent) And:
1. T.R.Rajendra Prasad S/o Late Ramakrishna Rao Aged about 60 years R/at Hasemane Mallanaduru village Konkere Post N.R.Pura Taluk Chikkamagaluru-577 139 2. T.Ramachandra Rao S/o Late Ramakrishna Rao Aged about 63 years R/at No.22, R.H.S. quarters Housing Board Colony Jyothinagara Chikkamagaluru-577 101 3. T.R.Raveendra Prasad S/o Late Ramkrishna Rao Aged about 50 years R/at Mavinakadu Nemmaru Post Shringeri Taluk Chikkamagalur-577 228 4. Smt Rajeevi S/o M.R.Balakrishna Aged about 53 years R/at Mavinakadu Nemmaru Post Shringeri Taluk Chikkamagalur-577 228 5. Smt Rajeshwari W/o Srinivasa Murthy Aged about 49 years R/at Thumbinakuli Guddekerei Post Thirthahalli Taluk Shivamogga-577 139 6. Smt Rajalakshmi W/o Srinivasa Murthy R/at Koppalu, Aralapura Post Thirthahalli Taluk Shivamogga-577 139 7. Smt Rajani W/o Shivakumar Aged about 41 years R/at Barathi Vokkada Anugraha Hosuru, Hebbri Post Karkala Taluk Udupi-574 104 ... Respondents This Regular Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of CPC, against the judgment and decree dated 12.04.2016 passed in R.A.No.53/2013 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Thirthahalli, dismissing the appeal and confirming the judgment and decree dated 05.04.2013 passed in OS No.18/2008 on the file of the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Thirthahalli.
This appeal coming on for further Orders, this day, the Court delivered the following:-
J U D G M E N T None appears for the appellant.
2. This Court on 05.02.2019, granted ten days time to comply with the office objections subject to the condition that the appeal would stand dismissed if the office objections are not complied with. The office objections have not been complied with despite this order.
3. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal.
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
SD/- JUDGE RB