IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NOs.25027-25030 OF 2015 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN:
1. T.R MANJULA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS W/O LATE MANJUNATHA 2. M.NITIN KUMAR AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS S/O LATE MANJUNATHA 3. TEJASWINI AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS D/O LATE MANJUNATHA SL. NOS. 1 TO 3 ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR GPA HOLDER RAVI AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, S/O MADEGOWDA, KUTTAWADI VILLAGE, BILIKERE HOBLI, HUNSUR TALUK, MYSOORU -577 103.
4. B.PUTTAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O B.BOREGOWDA, # 3133, I CROSS, 19TH MAIN, VIJAYANAGAR II STAGE, MYSOORU -570 001. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. G. S.PRASANNA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE BILIKERE POLICE STATION HUNASURU TALUK, MYSOORU DISTRICT-571 103.
2. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MYSOORU-570 001 3. ASST. DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MYSOORU-570 001.
4. TAHSILDAR HUNASURU TALUK, MYSOORU DISTRICT-571 103.
5. SURVEYOR OFFICE OF THE TAHSILDAR HUNASURU TALUK, MYSOORU DISTRICT-571 103.
6. NAGAMMA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, W/O LATE RUDRASHETTY, #46, 14TH MAIN, RAGHAVENDRA NAGARA MYSOORU-570 001. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI VIJAYA KUMAR A PATIL, AGA FOR R1 TO R5 SRI C.M.JAGADEESH, ADVOCATE FOR R6) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED LETTER DATED 9.4.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-G ISSUED BY THE R-1 POLICE, AND ALL SUBSEQUENT PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE RESPONDENTS 3-5 ON THE BASIS OF THE IMPUGNED LETTER AT ANNEXURE-G AND ETC.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Mr. G.S.Prasanna Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioners.
Mr. Vijay Kumar A.Patil, Additional Government Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 5.
Mr.C.M.Jagadeesh, learned Counsel for the respondent No.6.
The petitions are admitted for hearing. With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties, the petitions are heard finally.
2. When the matters were taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submitted that the petitioners have already approached the Civil Court by filing a civil suit.
3. In this view of the aforesaid submission, nothing survives for adjudication in these petitions.
Accordingly, the writ petitions are disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to prosecute the remedy of civil suit.
Sd/- JUDGE ln.