IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 29.06.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.8709 of 2004 And W.P.M.P.No.10200 of 2004 1.T.Muthukumarasamy 2.P.V.Vijai ... Petitioners Vs.
1. The State of Tamilnadu rep. by the Secretary to Government, Commercial Taxes and Religious Endowment Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 9.
2. The District Collector, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin.
3. The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Santhome, Chennai.
4. The Sub Registrar, Pudukkottai, Tuticorin Taluk, Tuticorin District. ... Respondents Prayer:
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records of the 2nd respondent comprised in Na.Mu.Ka.vu.ni.4/7295/2003 dated 27.11.03 and quash the same and direct the 4th respondent to receive and register the documents produced by the petitioner with respect of Survey No.1381/1, 1381/2, 1367/1A, 1367/3A, 1374/1A1, 1363/1A, 1361, 1375/1A, 1375/1B, 1364, 1372/1A, 1372/1B, 1372/2, 1360, 126/2A1, 1365/7, 1383/2, 1382, 1368/1, 1374/3, 1389, 1367/B, 1367/3B, 1365/5, 1363/1B, 1365/4, 1365/6, 1365/3, 1362/1, 1358/1, 1370, 1358/2, 1374/2, 1373, 1371, 1374/1A2 & 1B, 1375/2, 1378/2, 1366/1, 1366/3, 1363/4, 1377, 1369/2, 1369/1, 1365/1, 1378/1A, 1378/1B, 1368/3 in Mudivaithanenthal Village and in Survey No.89/1, 2,5: 90/2,3,4,5,6: 91/1, 92/1,4,5; 93/7, 105/3C, 107/1,4A, 4B;
108/1,2,3,4; 111/1/2; 112/2A,2B,3,4,7: 113/1,2,4,5,6: 114/3, 4A, 4B, 115/2,6,7,8,9: 116/1,2: 117/3,5,6,9, 119/1,2A,2B,3,4A,:
120/1,2: 129/1, 133/2,3,4,5,6, 116/3, 121/1A, 86/3, 87/2, 88/2, 115/1, 117/2, 119/4B, 117/2, 119/4B in varthagareddipatti village & Panchayat within the Subregistration District of Sub Registrar Pudukottai, Tuticorin District.
For Petitioners : Mr.S.Kadarkarai For Respondents : Mr.V.Jayaprakash Narayanan Special Government Pleader O R D E R The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submit that the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and hence the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the petition.
2.Recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.
29.06.2017 pri Speaking Order/ Non Speaking Order Index: Yes/ No Internet: Yes/ No To
1. The State of Tamilnadu rep. by the Secretary to Government, Commercial Taxes and Religious Endowment Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 9.
2. The District Collector, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin.
3. The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Santhome, Chennai.
4. The Sub Registrar, Pudukkottai, Tuticorin Taluk, Tuticorin District.
M.DHANDAPANI,J.
pri W.P.No.8709 of 2004 And W.P.M.P.No.10200 of 2004 29.06.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in