IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JULY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO.9619/2013 (LR-RES) BETWEEN:
1. SHRI T.K.RAMESH, S/O LATE SHRI KEMPANNA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT TARABARAHALLI VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH (ADL.) TALUK.
2. SHRI D.C.MARIYAPPA, S/O LATE SHRI DODDANANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT C.D.CHIKKANAHALLI VILLAGE, CHIKKABALLAPUR TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT.
…PETITIONERS (BY SRI G.A. SRIKANTE GOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LAND REVENUE, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE – 560 001.
2. THE LAND TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE NORTH (ADL.) TALUK, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE NORTH SUB – DIVISION, BANGALORE – 560 001.
3. SHRI T.NARAYANAPPA, S/O LATE SHRI THIMMARAYAPPA, MAJOR, R/AT SETTIGERE VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH (ADL.) TALUK.
4. SHRI R.NEELAKANTA RAO, S/O LATE RAMACHANDRA RAO, MAJOR, R/AT NO.871/77, 8TH CROSS, BANASHANKARI 1ST STAGE, BANGALORE – 560 050.
5. SHRI S.RAMA RAO, S/O LATE SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT TARABANAHALLI, JALA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH (ADL.) TALUK.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.B.P.RADHA, AGA FOR R1 AND R2; SRI P.M.GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR C/R3; R4 AND R5 ARE SERVED BUT REMAIN UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 07.02.2013 PASSED BY THE LAND TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE NORTH (ADDL.) TALUK IN CASE NO.LRF 7/1974-75 VIDE ANNEXURE – R AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo stating that the petitioners and contesting respondent No.3 have already settled the dispute involved in this proceedings and the said settlement is arrived out of Court with the intervention of common friends and well wishers.
It is in this background, this memo is filed seeking permission of the Court to withdraw this writ petition. The memo is signed by the petitioners, whose signatures are identified by their learned counsel. Along with the memo, joint affidavit of the petitioners is also filed in support of the said memo. Both memo and affidavit are taken on record.
Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as settled out of Court.
Sd/- JUDGE ca