Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Syeda Asma W/O Syed And Others vs 3 Are Minors And

High Court Of Karnataka|09 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF APRIL 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.8255 OF 2015 BETWEEN:
1. SYEDA ASMA W/O SYED AKBER, AGED 38 YEARS, 2. SYED UZAIF S/O SYED AKBER, AGED ABOUT 10 YEARS, 3. SYED ALIZA D/O SYED AKBER, AGED ABOUT 7 YEARS, PETITIONERS NO.2 AND 3 ARE MINORS AND REPRESENTED BY NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER, PETITIONER NO.1 ALL aRE RESIDENT OF PAMPA MAHAKAVI ROAD, TARIKERE CHIKKAMAGALORE DISTRICT-577228.
... PETITIONERS (BY SRI: KASHINATH J D, ADVOCATE) AND SYED AKBER S/O SYED MOOSA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, WHOLE SALE GARLIC TRADER, RESIDING AT SRI LAXMI NIVAS, BEHIND ADHICHUNCHANAGIRI ENGLISH SCHOOL, VIDYA NAGAR, HASSAN DISTRICT 573201.
... RESPONDENT (BY SRI: TANVEER AHMED SHARIFF, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 28.04.2015 PASSED IN CRL.R.P.NO. 302/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE., AT CHIKKAMAGALURU AS ILLEGAL AND ORDER TO DIRECT TO PAY THE BALANCE OF INTERIM ORDER OF MAINTENANCE AS ORDERED DATED 29.11.2011 BY THE CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AND JMFC TARIKERE IN CRL.MISC.NO. 481/2011 FILED BY THE PETITIONER AND PASS APPROPRIATE ORDER TO ENHANCE THE INTERIM MAINTENANCE TO AS THE INTERIM MAINTENANCE PROCEEDINGS ARE PENDING SINCE THE YEAR 2011.
THIS CRL.P COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Perused the petition.
2. Petitioners have sought to quash the order dated 28.04.2015 passed in Crl.R.P.No.302/2013 on the file of II Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Chickmagalur arising out of Crl.Misc.No.481/2011.
3. It is verified from the High Court Website that Crl.Misc.No.481/2011 filed by the petitioners has been disposed of by the order of the trial court dated 02.03.2017. As such, nothing survives for consideration in this petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed.
In view of dismissal of the main matter, I.A.No.1/2015 for direction does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE *mn/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Syeda Asma W/O Syed And Others vs 3 Are Minors And

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
09 April, 2019
Judges
  • John Michael Cunha