IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE:
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION No.30620/2018 (GM – CPC) BETWEEN:
SHRI SYED PEER S/O. SHRI SYED KARIM SAB, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/O. CHIKKABETTAHALLI VILLAGE, YESHWANTHPURA POST, BENGALURU – 560 097. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI SHANMUKHAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SHRI SYED SARDAR AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, 2. SHRI SYED MOULA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, 3. SHRI SEED AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, 4. SHRI SYED BASHA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 5. SHRI SYED ANSEER AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, 6. SHRI SYED AFSAR AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, 7. SHRI SYED ABZAL AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, ALL THE ABOVE SONS OF LATE SHRI SYED BUDEN SAB, RESIDENTS AT CHIKKABETTAHALLI, VIDYARANYAPURA POST, BENGALURU – 560 097.
REPRESENTED BY THEIR G.P.A. HOLDERS OF THE PLAINTIFF 1 TO 7 1. S. GOPALAKRISHNA, S/O. LATE SHEKAR NAIK, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, RESIDING AT 294, K.H.B., 5TH PHASE, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN, BANGALORE – 64.
2. SHAIKH MOULA S/O. SHAIKH YASEEN, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, RESIDING AT M.S. PALYA, VIDYARANYAPURA POST, BANGALORE – 97.
(8) SHRI SYED MASTAN S/O. SYED HUSOUF, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, (9) SHRI ATHAULLA S/O. SHRI SYED USMAN, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, (10) SHRI SYED THAYUB S/O. SYED USMAN, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, S.NO.(8) TO (10) ABOVE RESIDENTS AT CHIKKABATETTAHALLI, VIDYARANYAPURA POST, BENGALURU – 560 097. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI KUMARASWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR C/R-3; SRI ANIL SOMMANNA, ADVOCATE FOR R-1, R-2 & R-4 TO R-7) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 26.06.2018 PASSED BY THE LEARNED XXII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH NO.7), BENGALURU CITY, IN O.S.NO.9660/2006 ON IA NO.1/18 FILED UNDER SECTION 11(1) AND (2) OF THE KARNATAKA COURT FEES AND SUITS VALUATION ACT READ WITH ORDER-14 RULE-2 OF THE CPC VIDE ANNEXURE-A.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R This writ petition is filed against the order dated 26/06/2018 on I.A.No.1/18 in O.S.No.9660/2006 on the file of XXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru City, ('Trial Court' for short).
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that O.S.No.9660/2006 has been disposed of by the Trial Court and hence, writ petition does not survive for consideration.
3. Memo is placed on record.
4. In view of the aforesaid, writ petition stands dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE S*