Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Syed Khaja vs State Of Karnataka

High Court Of Karnataka|23 October, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K. N. PHANEENDRA CRL.P. NO. 5875/2019 BETWEEN SYED KHAJA S/O. SYED NOORULLA AGED 28 YEARS R/AT. NO.56, 1ST MAIN, 3RD CROSS NANJUNDESHWARA NAGAR NANDINI LAYOUT BENGALURU – 560 096 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. AFROZ PASHA, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND STATE OF KARNATAKA BY NANDINI LAYOUT P.S REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR KARNATAKA HIGH COURT HIGH COURT COMPLEX BENGALURU – 560 001 … RESPONDENT (BY SRI. ROHITH B. J, HCGP FOR) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.564/2018 OF NANDINI LAYOUT POLICE STATION, BENGALURU CITY FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/Ss.366(A) AND 376 OF IPC AND SEC. 5(L) AND 6 OF POCSO ACT 2012.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER The Order Sheet discloses that, on 22.10.2019, also there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, on that day, the case was adjourned to 23.10.2019 with an observation, on that day, if the petitioner’s counsel does not appear and assist the Court for disposal of the petition, the petition will be dismissed for non-prosecution.
Even today ie., on 23.10.2019, when the case called, neither the petitioner nor his counsel present. There is no representation on their behalf. It appears, the petitioner has no interest to prosecute the case. Therefore, the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE KGR*
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Syed Khaja vs State Of Karnataka

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
23 October, 2019
Judges
  • K N Phaneendra