Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Syed Fazal Koyamma Tangal And Others vs The Karnatak State Board Of Auquf And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|22 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. G. PANDIT WRIT APPEAL NOs.590 OF 2018 AND 691 OF 2018 (GM-WAKF ) BETWEEN:
1. SYED FAZAL KOYAMMA TANGAL KOORA SON OF ASYAD ADBUL REHMAN KUNIKOYA TANGAL, TAJULU ULLAMA ULLAL, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS REPRESENTED BY ITS MUTAWALLI BADRIYA JUMMA MASJID AND SIRAJUL HUDA MADRASA, BADRIYAANAGAR KUKKAJE, ISHWARAMANGALA PUTTUR, D.K. DISTRICT - 574 201.
2. SULLIMAN MISBAHI SON OF ABDUL RAHIMATH AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS PRESIDENT OF COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT OF BADRIYA JUMMA MASJID AND SIRAJUL HUDA MADRASA BADRIYAANAGAR KUKKAJE, ISHWARAMANGALA PUTTUR, DK DISTRICT PUTTUR TALUK DK DISTRICT - 574 201.
... APPELLANTS (BY SRI.G.H. RAVIKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SACHIN B. S, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE KARNATAK STATE BOARD OF AUQUF HAVING ITS OFFICE AT ‘DARUL AWKAF’ NO.6, CUNNINGHAM ROAD BENGALURU - 560 052 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER BENGALURU.
2. WAQF OFFICER THE DISTRICT WAQF ADVISORY BOARD DC OFFICE COMPOUND, MANGALURU-575 001 D.K. DISTRICT.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SUHAIL ALI, ADVOCATE) THESE APPEALS ARE FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 28.11.2017 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN W.P.NOs.44075- 44076 OF 2016.
THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT An affidavit is filed by the Chief Executive Officer namely Respondent No.1. He has stated that, in pursuance of the order passed by the learned Single Judge, elections have been conducted to the WAKF Institution. The same is not disputed by the appellants counsel.
In view of the same, nothing further survives for consideration. Accordingly, the writ appeals are dismissed as having become infructuous.
In view of dismissal of the appeals, all pending I.As. stand rejected.
Sd/- Sd/-
JUDGE JUDGE mpk/-* CT:SR
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Syed Fazal Koyamma Tangal And Others vs The Karnatak State Board Of Auquf And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
22 April, 2019
Judges
  • S G Pandit
  • Ravi Malimath