Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

S.Veluchamy vs The State Of Tamil Nadu Rep. By

Madras High Court|15 September, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

When the writ petition was taken up for hearing on 08.09.2017, there was no representation for the petitioners. Hence, the Writ petition was directed to be listed 'for dismissal' next week. Today (15.09.2017), when the writ petition is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioners, inspite of the matter being listed under the said caption and the name of the learned counsel for the petitioners having been called twice. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous petition is closed.
15.09.2017 mm To:
1. The Secretary to Government, Commercial Taxes and Religious Endowment Department, Chennai.
2. The District Collector/ The Inspector of Panchayats Pudukkottai District.
3. The Inspector General of Registration 120, Santhome High Road, Santhome, Chennai.
4. The Sub Registrar 1 & 2 Pudukkottai Town Pudukkottai District.
S.VAIDYANATHAN, J mm Order in W.P.No.13531 of 2004 15.09.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S.Veluchamy vs The State Of Tamil Nadu Rep. By

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
15 September, 2017