Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Svarna Land Development Private Limited vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|06 December, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 06th DAY OF DECEMBER 2017 BEFORE THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI WRIT PETITION No.46516/2017 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN:
SVARNA LAND DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED OLD No.602/2, NEW No.17/1 BELLARY ROAD, SADASHIVANAGAR BANGALORE-560080 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER AND AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR SESHADRI N V S/O LATE VENKATASUBBA SHASHTRY AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS.
….. PETITIONER (BY Mr. K. SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR Ms. ANUPARNA BORDOLOI, ADV.,) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE N.R.SQUARE, BANGALORE-560 002.
3. JOINT DIRECTOR OF TOWN PLANNING BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE N.R.SQUARE, BANGALORE-560 002.
... RESPONDENTS (BY Mr. A.K. VASANTH, AGA FOR R1 Mr. H. DEVENDRAPPA, ADV., FOR R2 & R3) Date of Order 06-12-2017 W.P.No.46516/2017 Svarna Land Development Private Limited Vs.
The State of Karnataka & others 2/2 THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO ISSUE OCCUPANCY CERTIFICATE IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONERS WITH RESPECT TO THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTY IN PURSUANT TO THE PETITIONERS APPLICATION DTD.24.4.2017 STRICTLY IN TERMS OF PLAN SANCTION DTD.27.3.2014 VIDE ANNEX-A & B & ETC.,.
THIS W.P. COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Mr. K. Shashi Kiran Shetty, Senior Counsel for Ms. Anuparna Bordoloi, Adv. for Petitioner Mr. A.K. Vasanth, AGA for R1 Mr. H. Devendrappa, Adv., for R2 & R3 1. The learned counsel for the Respondents-BBMP Mr.H.Devendrappa has handed over the Occupancy Certificate to the learned Senior counsel Mr.K.Shashi Kiran Shetty appearing for the petitioner and both the learned counsels therefore submit that the writ petition has become infructuous.
2. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
Srl.
Sd/- JUDGE
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Svarna Land Development Private Limited vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
06 December, 2017
Judges
  • Vineet Kothari