Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Sushma Sathi vs State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 September, 2021

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Shri K.K. Pandey has filed power on behalf of respondent no2. The same is taken on record.
Notice on behalf of respondent no.1 has been accepted by the office of the learned Chief Standing Counsel.
Heard Shri Devashish Bhatt, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Shri K.K. Pandey, learned counsel for respondent no.2 states that there is an inordinate delay in filing the writ petition. However, he prays for and is granted four weeks' time to file counter affidavit raising all the pleas available to the respondents including the plea of limitation.
The Petitioner, if so advised, may file rejoinder affidavit within two weeks thereafter.
List after expiry of the aforesaid period.
When the case is next listed the name of Shri K.K. Pandey shall be printed in the cause list as counsel for the respondent.
Order Date :- 27.9.2021 Anupam
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sushma Sathi vs State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 September, 2021
Judges
  • Rakesh Srivastava