Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Sushila And Another vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|24 August, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 36
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 20366 of 2021 Petitioner :- Sushila And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bhrigu Jee Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that after death of Krishna Srivastava @ Krishan Murari Lal, name of petitioner no. 1 (wife) and petitioner no. 2 (son) were mutated in Khatauni record vide order dated 17.10.2014 in which respondent no. 3 has filed objection along with stay application upon which vide order dated 28.11.2018, respondent no. 2 has stayed the order dated 17.10.2014 and till then proceeding is pending. It is next submitted that as per Rule 34 (7) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2016 maximum limitation for deciding the objection is three months, therefore, a suitable direction may be issued to respondent no. 2 to decide the objection filed by respondent no. 3 within time prescribed for which learned Standing Counsel has no objection.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no. 2 to decide the objection of respondent no. 3 after considering the reply of objection by the petitioners, maximum within a period of three months from the date of production of computer generated copy of this order after verifying the same from Official Website of Allahabad High Court.
Order Date :- 24.8.2021 Arvind
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sushila And Another vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
24 August, 2021
Judges
  • Neeraj Tiwari
Advocates
  • Bhrigu Jee Singh