Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Sushil Sharma vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 May, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 55
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 20517 of 2018 Applicant :- Sushil Sharma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Ravindra Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Z.K. Hasan, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.
According to prosecution case, F.I.R. was lodged against three accused persons, namely Sushil Sharma, Samandarsain, Sanjay alleging that Virendra Sharma (deceased) was a contract employee in Electricity Department, on 17.1.2018 at 1.30 p.m. he was doing work of electricity due to negligent resumption of electricity supply operated by accused persons, he was burnt and died.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. There was neither intention to kill nor accused had knowledge about death. There is no independent witness and eye witness account against the applicant. The story narrated by the complainant appears to be false fabricate and unnatural, that was nothing else but mere an accident. Offences levelled against the applicant are not attracted in the present case. He is languishing in jail since 30.3.2018 (two months) having no criminal history and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by learned counsel for the applicant and admitted that applicant has no criminal history.
Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties, facts of the case, nature of allegation and period of custody, gravity of offence, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for bail. Hence, the bail application is hereby allowed.
Let applicant Sushil Sharma involved in Case Crime No. 03 of 2018, under Section 304 IPC, Police Station Phugana, District Muzaffar Nagar be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 30.5.2018 A. Singh
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sushil Sharma vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 May, 2018
Judges
  • Aniruddha Singh
Advocates
  • Ravindra Sharma