Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Sushil Kumar vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|19 December, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 34533 of 2017 Petitioner :- Sushil Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prakash Narayan Tirpathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Adarsh Singh,Indra Raj Singh
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J.
Sri Rajan Jaiswal, Advocate holding brief of Sri Prakash Narayan Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner has stated at the Bar that the present writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of the above statement so made, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 19.12.2018 sailesh
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sushil Kumar vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
19 December, 2018
Judges
  • Vivek Kumar Birla
Advocates
  • Prakash Narayan Tirpathi

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.