Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sushil Kumar vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|25 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 54
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10889 of 2019 Petitioner :- Sushil Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bhaiya Lal Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,U.C. Chaturvedi
Hon'ble Naheed Ara Moonis,J. Hon'ble Anil Kumar-IX,J.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel Shri U.C. Chaturvedi appearing on behalf of the respondent no.4 and the learned A.G.A. for the State.
By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has invoked extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR dated 5.8.2018 registered as Case Crime No.484 of 2018, under Sections 420,467,468,471 IPC, P.S.
Sadar Bazar, District Saharanpur.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the impugned first information report has been lodged by the respondent no. 4 containing absolutely false and concocted allegations against the petitioner with the ulterior intention of harassing him. He further submitted that apart from the bald allegations made in the impugned F.I.R. no evidence is forthcoming even prima facie indicating at the complicity of the petitioner in the commission of the alleged crime and hence the impugned F.I.R. is liable to be quashed.
Per contra learned counsel for the respondent no.4 and the learned A.G.A. contended that the allegations made in the first information report cannot be aborted at this stage. The petitioner will have sufficient opportunity to rebut the allegations.
From perusal of the F.I.R., prima facie cognizable offences is made out at this stage against the petitioner, therefore, we do not find any cogent reason to quash the first information report. The prayer for quashing the first information report is refused.
However, in the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner, it is directed that the petitioner shall not be arrested in the aforesaid case till the submission of police report under Section 173 (2) Cr.P.C., subject to the restraint that he shall co- operate with the investigation and shall appear as and when called upon to assist in the investigation.
With the above direction, this petition is finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 25.4.2019 M. Tariq
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sushil Kumar vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
25 April, 2019
Judges
  • Naheed Ara Moonis
Advocates
  • Bhaiya Lal Yadav