0IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE:
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION No.7925/2016 (GM – CPC) BETWEEN:
1. SMT.SUSHEELAMMA W/O LATE RAMAKRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS 2. SRINIVASA S/O LATE RAMAKRISHNAPPAA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 3. SUDARSHAN S/O LATE RAMAKRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS PETITIONER Nos.1 TO 3 ARE R/AT No.44/4, 1ST MAIN, 5TH CROSS CHOWDAPPA BUILDINGS, YEMALUR BANGALORE-560037.
4. SANDYA D/O LATE RAMAKRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT No.1228, KALIDASANAGAR HOSAKERAHALLI BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE BANGALORE-560085. ... PETITIONERS [BY SRI B.J.KRISHNA, ADV.] AND:
1. SMT.LAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT No.37, CHOLATE, BAGALUR JALA HOBLI, BAGALUR POST-562110 DEVANAHALLI TALUK BANGALORE DISTRICT.
2. SMT.ANASUYAMMA W/O H.R.GOVINDAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT HEGGONDANAHALLI SARJAPUR HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK-562106 BANGALORE DISTRICT.
3. SMT.THAYAMMA W/O PONNUSWAMY AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS IDGAH ROAD, VARTHUR-560037 BANGALORE EAST.
4. SRI K.NARAYANASWAMY S/O LATE KEMPAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT D.NO.122, 2ND BLOCK YAMALUR VILLAGE AND POST BANGALORE-560037.
5. SMT.JAMUNA W/O H.SRINIVASAN AGE: MAJOR, R/AT YAMALUR VILLAGE AND POST BANGALORE-560037.
SRI C.SRIDHARAN, DEAD BY LR’s 6. SMT.KAMALM W/O LATE C.SRIDHARAN AGE: MAJOR R/AT No.508, GARUTHAMAN PARK R.V. ROAD BANGALORE-560074. …RESPONDENTS [BY SRI T.MANJUNATHA, ADV. FOR R-1 TO R-3; SRI D.A.SHIVAKUMAR, ADV. FOR R-5;
SRI G.RAJAKUMAR, ADV. FOR R-4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED VII ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE [CCH-19] AT BANGALORE IN O.S.NO.205/2005 ORDERS ON I.A.NO.7 DATED 07.07.2015 ON IA UNDER ORDER 1 RULE 10[2] OF CPC VIDE ANNEXURE-E; AND ETC., THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R This writ petition is filed against the order dated 07.07.2015 on I.A.No.7 in O.S.No.205/2005 on the file of the VII Additional City Civil Judge [CCH-19] at Bangalore ['Trial Court' for short].
2. It is discerned that the said O.S.No.205/2005 has been disposed of by the Trial Court and hence, writ petition do not survive for consideration.
In view of the aforesaid, writ petition stands dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE NC.